Ask A Question
 
rbravo
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 13
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 5 Months ago #1
I attended the talk Dr. Lynn gave at the Smithsonian the other night. I was a bit disappointed. The first half hour was mainly a summary of the first chapter of the book! The rest quickly summed up the rest of his book. Although, I haven't yet finished reading his book, he didn't depart at all from the points he made in it, in fact, he quoted directly from it quite frequently during his talk.

He discussed Chaplin's childhood and attempted to separate the fact from fiction that Chaplin created in his early years. After that, the major points he made were: 1) the recurring rescue theme in Chaplin's films which no doubt reflected his childish fantasy's of 'rescuing' his mentally deranged mother (rescuing Paulette in 'Modern Times', the blind flower girl in 'City Lights', etc.); 2) the recurring insanity theme in Chaplin's films (such as the schizophrenic drunken millionaire in 'City Lights', the scenes where Charlie goes 'crazy' after being accidentally shot up with drugs in 'Easy Street' and accidentally used the 'nose candy' in 'Modern Times'; and, 3) Chaplin's decided pro-communist leanings. Although Lynn did point out, quite rightly, that despite their exhaustive investigation, the FBI never found any hard proof of any communist affiliation.

That last one disturbed me the most. I don't think that Chaplin was a communist. I think he was more of a naive idealist who befriended many known communists.
The topic has been locked.
CouchPhysicist
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 18
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 5 Months ago #2
No doubt he felt that was the safest strategy.

That's because there was no affiliation to prove.

I think you're right. Lynn cites a witness before HUAC who said someone told him that CC was an 'undercover' member. This was a safe boast to make, since by definition such members did not disclose their membership, and no doubt some US Communists liked to think that certain celebrities were secret members, whether they actually were or not.

In any case, such 'evidence' is pure hearsay of the most egregious kind. Lynn deserves at least a loud raspberry for even including it in his book.

Did you get a chance to make any acquaintances there? Did they open the floor for questions?

Connie K.
The topic has been locked.
nextfrix
Fresh Boarder
Blog Posts: 0
Forum Posts: 18
Rating: 0ApplaudCriticize
Posted 2 Years, 5 Months ago #3
Alicia
The topic has been locked.

Spread the Word!

Four out of five users would recommend us to a friend. Shouldn't you?
Link to Us    Tell a Friend

Related Posts:

The Content on this site is provided for general information purposes only. Your use of the Content, or any part thereof, is made solely at Your own risk and responsibility. By entering this site you declare you read and agreed to its Terms, Rules & Privacy.
Copyright © 2006 - 2010 Charlie Chaplin Club