My Profile

Keep Up to Date:
Blog RSS
Blog
Forum RSS
Forum
Post New Topic Post Reply
Posted 1 Month, 3 Weeks ago
Vhear
Senior Boarder
Posts: 52
graphgraph
User Offline
 
The discussion about poor staging in 'TPR' prompted this question: There is a prolonged scene in 'Face' in which Chaplin is painting one of his models. I believe that the joke is supposed to be that it appears that he is spending an inordinate amount of time drawing the lady's hinder, when, in fact, he is painting the shapely details of a vase positioned between him and the model. Once he has finished the shape, he paints some sprouts coming out of the top. The problem is, no print I have ever seen actually shows the vase, and it is something of a mystery to most viewers exactly what he is doing.

Any thoughts?

Richard Ward
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Month, 3 Weeks ago
Lahasaert
Senior Boarder
Posts: 60
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Oh man, this film gives me fits - there are so many chunks missing, and the versions I've seen are poorly sequenced.

It's as if somebody had the film, cut it into pieces, and reassembled it haphazardly. Probably some pieces were eaten by the dog too.

It would also probably make more sense if there was a sharp print available!!
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Month, 3 Weeks ago
rbravo
Senior Boarder
Posts: 57
graphgraph
User Offline
 
The only print I have seen of Face is the one issued by Official Films with obtrusive music and sound effects. It is hard to assess something like that.
The administrator has disabled public write access.
Posted 1 Month, 3 Weeks ago
MatiCamsb
Senior Boarder
Posts: 52
graphgraph
User Offline
 
Yeah, the absolute worst is the Official Films version, which left out all of the poem save the first verse. Without subtitles, the film makes no sense, and, additionally, they introduced the guy who steals Charlie's girl much too early. I bought 16mm prints of the Official version and the 'Ham Artist' variant, which has the subtitles, and put the best of the two together in reasonably correct order thanks to sequencing suggestions from Doug Sulpy. The thing with the vase is still a mystery, though, because the painting scene I described earlier is done in one long take, suggesting that there is not a shot missing. I have wondered if the film was badly cropped in reprinting, hence leaving out the vase.

Richard Ward
The administrator has disabled public write access.
 
Copyright © 2006 - Dec 2008 Charlie Chaplin Club